This report tracks the metrics from the 6 July 2026 testing block across all six sessions on file, framed for an Olympic-pathway long jumper. The board view (KPIs) flags trajectory at a glance; the trend charts, asymmetry panel, and elite benchmark table sit beneath. Every value is the session mean across reps, computed from the same trial-level data VALD prints in its single-day reports.
Performance scoreboard
Read in one breath: The 6 July session is the best vertical output on file. CMJ flight-time jump height hit a new peak of 55.3 cm, and the four static jumps averaged 53.8 cm flight-time height (21.2 in) — up from 49.8 cm in March, so the purely-concentric engine has closed most of the gap to the countermovement ceiling. Just as important, the asymmetry picture that headlined the March report has largely resolved: CMJ eccentric mean-force asymmetry pulled back from −22% to −13%, DJ eccentric mean-force asymmetry dropped from 25% to 12% R (now inside the healthy band), and DJ landing RFD asymmetry collapsed from 52% to 4%. Two items stay on the watch list: drop-landing RFD asymmetry is still elevated at 40% R, and this session's drop jumps were slower than the winter block (291 ms contacts, RSI 2.32 vs the 2.91 peak) — worth confirming drop height and cueing were consistent before reading that as a true decline.
Trends — Power & jump output
CMJ · Jump height (Imp-Mom) in
SJ · Jump height — Flight Time & Imp-Mom in
DJ · Jump height — Flight Time & Imp-Mom in
Peak Power / BM — all jump types W/kg
Trends — Reactive strength & ground contact
CMJ · RSI-modified (Imp-Mom) m/s
SJ · RSI-modified (Imp-Mom) m/s
DJ · RSI (Flight Time / Contact Time)
DJ · Ground contact time ms
Trends — Force production
Concentric Peak Force / BM N/kg
Eccentric Peak Force / BM N/kg
Concentric RFD / BM N/s/kg
DJ · Concentric Mean Power / BM W/kg
Trends — Eccentric capacity & landing mechanics
Eccentric Deceleration RFD N/s
DJ · Drop Landing RFD N/s
Asymmetry tracking (L–R%, positive = right-dominant)
CMJ · Concentric Peak Force Asymmetry
CMJ · Eccentric Peak Force Asymmetry
DJ · Concentric Mean Force Asymmetry
DJ · Eccentric Mean Force Asymmetry
DJ · Landing RFD Asymmetry
DJ · Drop Landing RFD Asymmetry
Long-jump context · what these numbers mean
Vertical takeoff potential55.3 cm CMJ flight-time jump height — a new best — puts Aasha solidly in the elite-female window (typical world-class long jumpers test 50–60 cm). Sustained and still climbing over six sessions, the vertical engine is meet-ready.
Reactive strengthDJ RSI peaked at 2.91 with 227 ms contacts in February; the July session read slower (2.32, 291 ms). World-class jumpers operate at RSI > 2.5 with sub-200 ms reactive contacts on 30–40 cm drop heights — re-test with a verified drop height to confirm whether July was protocol noise or a real dip.
Plant-leg force toleranceEccentric Peak Force / BM has climbed from 17.6 to 22.1 N/kg (CMJ) and 22.9 to 25.7 N/kg (SJ). Long-jump board contact loads the plant leg at ~10× BW for ~120 ms — eccentric capacity is the headline determinant of how much approach velocity she can convert to flight without injury.
Watch listMost of the winter asymmetry drift corrected in July — DJ eccentric mean-force asymmetry fell from 25% to 12% R and landing RFD asymmetry from 52% to 4%. The one metric still flagged is drop-landing RFD asymmetry at 40% R (healthy < 15%): the initial catch off the box still loads the right side hardest, so keep unilateral eccentric/landing work in the program.
Elite benchmarks · women's long jump & jump-trained athletes
| Metric | Aasha (latest) | Elite female reference | Status |
|---|
| CMJ Jump Height (Flight Time) | 55.3 cm | 50–60 cm (world-class jumpers) | Elite range — new best |
| CMJ Peak Power / BM | 67.5 W/kg | ≥ 55 W/kg (national / elite) | Above elite |
| CMJ Concentric Peak Force / BM | 25.2 N/kg | 22–28 N/kg (jump-trained) | In range |
| CMJ RSI-modified (Imp-Mom) | 0.55 m/s | 0.45–0.60 elite, > 0.55 world-class | Elite |
| SJ Jump Height (Flight Time) | 21.2 in (53.8 cm) | SJ ≈ CMJ × 0.85–0.95 in elites | New best — near CMJ parity |
| DJ RSI (FT/CT) | 2.32 | > 2.0 advanced, > 2.5 elite, > 3.0 world-class | Down from 2.91 — verify drop height |
| DJ Contact Time | 291 ms | < 250 ms reactive, < 200 ms world-class | Slower this session |
| DJ Concentric Mean Power / BM | 127 W/kg | > 100 W/kg jump-trained female | Above |
| CMJ Concentric Peak Force Asymmetry | 7.1% R | < 10% healthy, 10–15% caution | Healthy |
| DJ Eccentric Mean Force Asymmetry | 12% R | < 15% healthy, > 20% concerning | Resolved — was 25% |
| DJ Drop Landing RFD Asymmetry | 40% R | < 15% healthy | Improving, still address |
| DJ Landing RFD Asymmetry | 4.3% R | < 20% acceptable | Resolved — was 52% |
Reference ranges drawn from peer-reviewed force-plate norms in jump-trained female athletes (CMJ/DJ literature) and ForceDecks aggregate cohorts. Treat as orientation, not pass/fail thresholds.
Glossary & methodology
Source. VALD ForceDecks dual-force-plate; per-test trial detail pulled from the VALD external API (US-East tenant).
Aggregation. Each session value is the mean across all valid reps that day. Where a session contained more reps than the printed VALD report (e.g. 4 reps on 11 Feb 2026), the additional reps are included so the trend reflects the full evidence on file.
6 Jul 2026 static jumps. The four static jumps that day were captured under a CMJ test in VALD (the software auto-classified them), so they were separated from the three true countermovement jumps by countermovement depth: the static reps dipped only 6–10 cm before takeoff versus ~41 cm on the true CMJs. The static reps are charted in the SJ series to keep that trend continuous.
Imp-Mom vs Flight-Time. Imp-Mom (impulse-momentum) jump height is the gold-standard from force-plate integration; Flight-Time is what an optical timing gate would read. Both are reported here to match the format Jizelle provided.
RSI variants. RSI-modified = jump height ÷ time to takeoff (CMJ/SJ); RSI = flight time ÷ contact time (DJ). Different denominators — they are not directly comparable.
Asymmetry sign. Positive % = right limb dominant; negative % = left limb dominant. A 0% bar is perfect symmetry.
Body-mass normalisation. Force and power metrics shown as "/ BM" are divided by the athlete's body mass on the test day, so changes in load reflect strength and not weight gain/loss.