This report tracks the metrics from the 11 March 2026 testing block across all five sessions on file, framed for an Olympic-pathway long jumper. The board view (KPIs) flags trajectory at a glance; the trend charts, asymmetry panel, and elite benchmark table sit beneath. Every value is the session mean across reps, computed from the same trial-level data VALD prints in its single-day reports.
Performance scoreboard
Read in one breath: Vertical ceiling is locked in at an elite standard — flight-time jump height is parked at 53–54 cm and CMJ peak power is steady at ~66 W/kg. Reactive strength (DJ RSI) has climbed from 1.80 to a peak of 2.91 and is expressing as faster ground-contact times near 230 ms — the exact direction a long jumper wants between now and a peak. The trade-off showing up is on the eccentric side: eccentric mean-force asymmetry has drifted from −13% to −22% R-dominant in CMJ, and drop-landing RFD asymmetry has climbed past 50%. For a long jumper this is the single trend that needs intervention before the season's peak meets — a unilateral takeoff sport tolerates some asymmetry, but the eccentric / landing side is where overuse injuries (patellar tendon, lower-back) appear first.
Trends — Power & jump output
CMJ · Jump height (Imp-Mom) in
SJ · Jump height (Imp-Mom) in
DJ · Jump height (Imp-Mom) in
Peak Power / BM — all jump types W/kg
Trends — Reactive strength & ground contact
CMJ · RSI-modified (Imp-Mom) m/s
SJ · RSI-modified (Imp-Mom) m/s
DJ · RSI (Flight Time / Contact Time)
DJ · Ground contact time ms
Trends — Force production
Concentric Peak Force / BM N/kg
Eccentric Peak Force / BM N/kg
Concentric RFD / BM N/s/kg
DJ · Concentric Mean Power / BM W/kg
Trends — Eccentric capacity & landing mechanics
Eccentric Deceleration RFD N/s
DJ · Drop Landing RFD N/s
Asymmetry tracking (L–R%, positive = right-dominant)
CMJ · Concentric Peak Force Asymmetry
CMJ · Eccentric Peak Force Asymmetry
DJ · Concentric Mean Force Asymmetry
DJ · Eccentric Mean Force Asymmetry
DJ · Landing RFD Asymmetry
DJ · Drop Landing RFD Asymmetry
Long-jump context · what these numbers mean
Vertical takeoff potential53 cm CMJ flight-time jump height puts Aasha in the elite-female window (typical world-class long jumpers test 50–60 cm). Sustained over five sessions, this confirms the vertical engine is meet-ready.
Reactive strengthDJ RSI of 2.6–2.9 with contact times in the 227–259 ms band aligns with what fast-elastic athletes produce. World-class jumpers operate at RSI > 2.5 with sub-200 ms reactive contacts on 30–40 cm drop heights — Aasha's contact times are trending in the right direction.
Plant-leg force toleranceEccentric Peak Force / BM has climbed from 17.6 to 21.5 N/kg (CMJ) and 22.9 to 24.9 N/kg (SJ). Long-jump board contact loads the plant leg at ~10× BW for ~120 ms — eccentric capacity is the headline determinant of how much approach velocity she can convert to flight without injury.
Watch listEccentric mean-force asymmetry in DJ has moved 17 → 25% R-dominant. Drop-landing RFD asymmetry now > 50%. The takeoff-leg in long jump is unilateral, so some asymmetry is normal — but a widening eccentric gap on the contralateral side flags the brake mechanism on landings, which is where soft-tissue load accumulates.
Elite benchmarks · women's long jump & jump-trained athletes
| Metric | Aasha (latest) | Elite female reference | Status |
|---|
| CMJ Jump Height (Flight Time) | 53.4 cm | 50–60 cm (world-class jumpers) | Elite range |
| CMJ Peak Power / BM | 65.9 W/kg | ≥ 55 W/kg (national / elite) | Above elite |
| CMJ Concentric Peak Force / BM | 24.7 N/kg | 22–28 N/kg (jump-trained) | In range |
| CMJ RSI-modified (Imp-Mom) | 0.52 m/s | 0.45–0.60 elite, > 0.55 world-class | Elite |
| SJ Jump Height (Imp-Mom) | 18.8 in (47.7 cm) | SJ ≈ CMJ × 0.85–0.95 in elites | Strong purely-concentric |
| DJ RSI (FT/CT) | 2.57 | > 2.0 advanced, > 2.5 elite, > 3.0 world-class | Elite |
| DJ Contact Time | 259 ms | < 250 ms reactive, < 200 ms world-class | Reactive — push toward 200 ms |
| DJ Concentric Mean Power / BM | 132 W/kg | > 100 W/kg jump-trained female | Above |
| CMJ Concentric Peak Force Asymmetry | 8.8% R | < 10% healthy, 10–15% caution | Healthy |
| DJ Eccentric Mean Force Asymmetry | 25% R | < 15% healthy, > 20% concerning | Address |
| DJ Drop Landing RFD Asymmetry | 57% R | < 15% healthy | Address |
| DJ Landing RFD Asymmetry | 52% R | < 20% acceptable | Address |
Reference ranges drawn from peer-reviewed force-plate norms in jump-trained female athletes (CMJ/DJ literature) and ForceDecks aggregate cohorts. Treat as orientation, not pass/fail thresholds.
Glossary & methodology
Source. VALD ForceDecks dual-force-plate; per-test trial detail pulled from the VALD external API (US-East tenant).
Aggregation. Each session value is the mean across all valid reps that day. Where a session contained more reps than the printed VALD report (e.g. 4 reps on 11 Feb 2026), the additional reps are included so the trend reflects the full evidence on file.
Imp-Mom vs Flight-Time. Imp-Mom (impulse-momentum) jump height is the gold-standard from force-plate integration; Flight-Time is what an optical timing gate would read. Both are reported here to match the format Jizelle provided.
RSI variants. RSI-modified = jump height ÷ time to takeoff (CMJ/SJ); RSI = flight time ÷ contact time (DJ). Different denominators — they are not directly comparable.
Asymmetry sign. Positive % = right limb dominant; negative % = left limb dominant. A 0% bar is perfect symmetry.
Body-mass normalisation. Force and power metrics shown as "/ BM" are divided by the athlete's body mass on the test day, so changes in load reflect strength and not weight gain/loss.