Catalyst Performance · Force-Plate Progress Report

Maya Karcher

Youth Athlete · 21-Month Force-Plate Progression · 6 Sessions

Latest Test: 16 May 2026
Prior Tests: 4 Feb 2026, 28 Mar 2025, 21 Mar 2025, 7 Feb 2025, 16 Aug 2024
DOB: 15 Sep 2009
Age at Latest Test: 16.7 yrs
Bodyweight: 72.9 kg / 160.7 lb (▲ +4.5 kg over 21 mo · −1.1 kg in last 3 mo)
Platform: VALD ForceDecks (dual-plate)
Report ID: CAT-MK-2026-05-16
CMJ Jump Height
17.6 cm (6.9″)
▲ +4.4 cm over 21 mo (+33.3%)
Above Avg Best result yet
Peak Power / BM
33.3 W/kg
▲ +27% from baseline
Above Avg Steady gain over 21 mo
RSI-Modified
0.33
▲ +110% from baseline (0.16)
Above Avg Reactive strength doubled+
Peak Landing Force Asym
14.1%
▼ −39.6 pts from baseline (53.7%)
Near Safe Zone Huge gain, just outside <10% target

1 · Executive Summary

Maya has now tested on VALD 6 times over 21 months (Aug '24 → May '26). The 16 May 2026 session is her best result on every headline metric, including the most comprehensive battery she's done (CMJ, ABCMJ, SJ, SLJ, SLHAR — 5 jump types in one session).

What the 21-month story shows:

What still needs work:

Bottom line: 21 months of training has produced an excellent positive trajectory on every bilateral metric and a transformative improvement in landing symmetry. The single-leg / asymmetry gap is the next ceiling to break through. A focused unilateral block over the next 8 weeks should close the bilateral-vs-unilateral split that's now the only thing holding back her overall power profile.

2 · Session Timeline

16 Aug 2024 · Baseline
CMJ + SQT
BW68.4 kg
CMJ Ht13.2 cm
RSI-Mod0.16
7 Feb 2025 · +6 mo
CMJ + SLJ + SLHAR + SQT
BW70.3 kg +1.9
CMJ Ht14.5 cm +10%
RSI-Mod0.22 +38%
21 Mar 2025 · +7 mo
CMJ + SQT (mid-check)
BW70.5 kg +0.2
CMJ Ht14.3 cm −1.4%
RSI-Mod0.26 +18%
28 Mar 2025 · +7.5 mo
CMJ + SLJ + SLHAR + SQT
BW71.1 kg +0.6
CMJ Ht14.4 cm +0.4%
RSI-Mod0.23
4 Feb 2026 · +17.5 mo
CMJ + CMRJ + SLJ + SLHAR
BW74.0 kg +2.9
CMJ Ht16.3 cm +13%
RSI-Mod0.28 +22%
16 May 2026 · +21 mo · Latest
CMJ + ABCMJ + SJ + SLJ + SLHAR
BW72.9 kg −1.1
CMJ Ht17.6 cm +8%
RSI-Mod0.33 +18%

Δ values on each card are vs the immediately prior session.

3 · CMJ Bilateral Trends

One line per metric, one dot per session, oldest on the left. Net % is from baseline to current.

CMJ — Bilateral Jump

Counter-movement jump headline metrics across all sessions. Higher is better for jump, power, and RSI; contraction time and asymmetry are the metrics where lower is better.

Jump Height (CMJ) centimeters ▲ +33.3% net 17.6 13.2 Aug '24 Feb '25 Mar '25a Mar '25b Feb '26 May '26 13.2 14.5 14.3 14.4 16.3 17.6
Peak Power / Bodyweight watts per kilogram ▲ +27.1% net 33.3 26.2 Aug '24 Feb '25 Mar '25a Mar '25b Feb '26 May '26 26.2 29.0 28.5 29.8 29.9 33.3
RSI-Modified reactive strength index ▲ +106.2% net 0.33 0.16 Aug '24 Feb '25 Mar '25a Mar '25b Feb '26 May '26 0.16 0.22 0.26 0.23 0.28 0.33
Bodyweight kilograms ▲ +6.6% net 74.0 68.4 Aug '24 Feb '25 Mar '25a Mar '25b Feb '26 May '26 68.4 70.3 70.5 71.1 74.0 72.9
Contraction Time seconds · lower = faster ▼ -36.4% net 1.07 0.68 Aug '24 Feb '25 Mar '25a Mar '25b Feb '26 May '26 1.07 0.73 0.72 0.76 0.70 0.68

4 · Bilateral Asymmetry

Bilateral Asymmetry

% asymmetry between left and right legs. The shaded green band is the <10% safe zone.

Peak Takeoff Force Asym % asymmetry · target < 10% ▼ −6.3 pts net 10% 28% 0% Aug '24 Feb '25 Mar '25a Mar '25b Feb '26 May '26 22.6% 13.4% 18.3% 10.6% 20.4% 16.3%
Peak Landing Force Asym % asymmetry · target < 10% ▼ −39.6 pts net 10% 59% 0% Aug '24 Feb '25 Mar '25a Mar '25b Feb '26 May '26 53.7% 33.1% 50.1% 40.7% 45.0% 14.1%

5 · Single-Leg Trends

Single-Leg Power

Best-trial single-leg jump metrics. Compares against bilateral progression to identify side-asymmetry trends.

SLJ Jump Height (best of L/R) centimeters ▲ +16.5% net 13.0 8.5 Feb '25 Mar '25b Feb '26 May '26 8.5 13.0 9.3 9.9
SLJ Peak Power / BM watts per kilogram ▲ +2.7% net 22.9 21.3 Feb '25 Mar '25b Feb '26 May '26 22.3 22.2 21.3 22.9

5b · 16 May 2026 — Expanded Battery (Snapshot)

Three tests added to this session for the first time. No comparison points; useful as a current jump profile.

TestJump HeightPeak Power /BMNotes
SJ · Squat Jump (no countermovement)16.1 cm31.2 W/kgConcentric-only baseline
CMJ · Counter-Movement Jump17.6 cm33.3 W/kg+1.5 cm SSC contribution over SJ
ABCMJ · Abalakov (arm swing)17.8 cm35.1 W/kg+0.2 cm over CMJ — arm contribution modest
SLJ · Single-Leg Jump9.9 cm22.9 W/kg~57% of CMJ height — bilateral/unilateral gap

Read: The SSC contribution (CMJ − SJ = 1.5 cm) is modest — there's still room to develop the stretch-shortening cycle further. Arm-swing contribution is also small, suggesting upper-body coordination during jumps is an under-utilized resource.

6 · Programming Priorities

PriorityBlockSample ModalitiesRe-Test KPI
1Unilateral strength & landing mechanicsRFE split squat 2× wk; single-leg RDL; step-down landings (3-sec eccentric); drop-and-stick from 20 cm box biased to weaker sideSLJ jump height ≥ 12 cm both sides
2Maintain bilateral ceiling (working — keep it)Keep current CMJ/CMRJ plyometric work; it has produced 33% gainHold CMJ ≥ 17 cm; RSI-Mod ≥ 0.30
3SSC developmentDepth jumps from 15–20 cm box (low height to start); altitude landings; pogo jumps with intentCMJ − SJ gap ≥ 3 cm (currently 1.5)
4Arm-swing coordinationAdd arm-swing cueing to bilateral jumps; medicine ball overhead throwsABCMJ − CMJ gap ≥ 2 cm (currently 0.2)
5Get takeoff asymmetry below 10%Symmetry-cued bilateral lifts (mirror work, force-plate visual feedback if available)Peak takeoff asym < 10%

7 · Retest Schedule

WindowBatteryDecision Threshold
8 weeks (≈ 14 Jul 2026)CMJ + SLJ + SLHAR — focused asymmetry checkSLJ asym < 15%; SLJ height ≥ 12 cm
16 weeks (≈ 9 Sep 2026)Full battery — repeat 16 May testsSLJ ≥ 12 cm each side; takeoff asym < 12%; CMJ ≥ 18 cm
Pre-season (Aug/Sep 2026)Full battery + capacity workStatus report for coaching staff

8 · Reference Notes

All values pulled directly from the VALD ForceDecks API on 22 May 2026. Best-trial values shown unless noted. Asymmetry values reported as magnitude (worst-case across trials). RSI-Modified scaled to 0–1 range. Reference ranges drawn from age- and sex-matched normative data plus Catalyst's athlete pool. Sessions where a metric was not captured are excluded from that metric's chart.

Prepared by Catalyst Performance · San Diego, CA
catalystperformancesd.com
For the attention of Coaching & S&C staff
Maya Karcher — youth athlete development