Latest Test: 16 May 2026 Prior Tests: 4 Feb 2026, 28 Mar 2025, 21 Mar 2025, 7 Feb 2025, 16 Aug 2024 DOB: 15 Sep 2009 Age at Latest Test: 16.7 yrs Bodyweight: 72.9 kg / 160.7 lb (▲ +4.5 kg over 21 mo · −1.1 kg in last 3 mo) Platform: VALD ForceDecks (dual-plate) Report ID: CAT-MK-2026-05-16
CMJ Jump Height
17.6 cm (6.9″)
▲ +4.4 cm over 21 mo (+33.3%)
Above Avg Best result yet
Peak Power / BM
33.3 W/kg
▲ +27% from baseline
Above Avg Steady gain over 21 mo
RSI-Modified
0.33
▲ +110% from baseline (0.16)
Above Avg Reactive strength doubled+
Peak Landing Force Asym
14.1%
▼ −39.6 pts from baseline (53.7%)
Near Safe Zone Huge gain, just outside <10% target
1 · Executive Summary
Maya has now tested on VALD 6 times over 21 months (Aug '24 → May '26). The 16 May 2026 session is her best result on every headline metric, including the most comprehensive battery she's done (CMJ, ABCMJ, SJ, SLJ, SLHAR — 5 jump types in one session).
What the 21-month story shows:
CMJ jump height: 13.2 → 17.6 cm (+33%) — steady gain across nearly every session. Up 1.3 cm in just the last 3 months.
Power /BM: 26.2 → 33.3 W/kg (+27%) — biggest jump in the most recent session (+11% in 3 months).
RSI-Modified more than doubled (0.16 → 0.33) — reactive strength is the standout improvement.
Bilateral landing asymmetry dropped from 53.7% to 14.1% — the most dramatic transformation in the data set. Maya started with severe leg-leg imbalance and has now closed the gap to within striking distance of the <10% safe zone.
Contraction time has tightened (1.07 → 0.68 s) — she is generating more output with faster ground contact.
Bodyweight stable around 73 kg — actually lost 1.1 kg in last 3 months while gaining 1.3 cm in jump height. Quality body composition shift.
What still needs work:
Single-leg jump is the unresolved gap — SLJ height ~9–10 cm, no clear upward trend over 15 months. Bilateral CMJ is up 33% but unilateral is essentially flat. Classic compensation pattern — bilateral output is using a dominant side.
Takeoff force asymmetry plateau at 16.3% — better than the 22.6% baseline but still above the 10% target. Hasn't budged much in the last year.
Bottom line: 21 months of training has produced an excellent positive trajectory on every bilateral metric and a transformative improvement in landing symmetry. The single-leg / asymmetry gap is the next ceiling to break through. A focused unilateral block over the next 8 weeks should close the bilateral-vs-unilateral split that's now the only thing holding back her overall power profile.
2 · Session Timeline
16 Aug 2024 · Baseline
CMJ + SQT
BW68.4 kg
CMJ Ht13.2 cm
RSI-Mod0.16
7 Feb 2025 · +6 mo
CMJ + SLJ + SLHAR + SQT
BW70.3 kg +1.9
CMJ Ht14.5 cm +10%
RSI-Mod0.22 +38%
21 Mar 2025 · +7 mo
CMJ + SQT (mid-check)
BW70.5 kg +0.2
CMJ Ht14.3 cm −1.4%
RSI-Mod0.26 +18%
28 Mar 2025 · +7.5 mo
CMJ + SLJ + SLHAR + SQT
BW71.1 kg +0.6
CMJ Ht14.4 cm +0.4%
RSI-Mod0.23
4 Feb 2026 · +17.5 mo
CMJ + CMRJ + SLJ + SLHAR
BW74.0 kg +2.9
CMJ Ht16.3 cm +13%
RSI-Mod0.28 +22%
16 May 2026 · +21 mo · Latest
CMJ + ABCMJ + SJ + SLJ + SLHAR
BW72.9 kg −1.1
CMJ Ht17.6 cm +8%
RSI-Mod0.33 +18%
Δ values on each card are vs the immediately prior session.
3 · CMJ Bilateral Trends
One line per metric, one dot per session, oldest on the left. Net % is from baseline to current.
CMJ — Bilateral Jump
Counter-movement jump headline metrics across all sessions. Higher is better for jump, power, and RSI; contraction time and asymmetry are the metrics where lower is better.
4 · Bilateral Asymmetry
Bilateral Asymmetry
% asymmetry between left and right legs. The shaded green band is the <10% safe zone.
5 · Single-Leg Trends
Single-Leg Power
Best-trial single-leg jump metrics. Compares against bilateral progression to identify side-asymmetry trends.
5b · 16 May 2026 — Expanded Battery (Snapshot)
Three tests added to this session for the first time. No comparison points; useful as a current jump profile.
Test
Jump Height
Peak Power /BM
Notes
SJ · Squat Jump (no countermovement)
16.1 cm
31.2 W/kg
Concentric-only baseline
CMJ · Counter-Movement Jump
17.6 cm
33.3 W/kg
+1.5 cm SSC contribution over SJ
ABCMJ · Abalakov (arm swing)
17.8 cm
35.1 W/kg
+0.2 cm over CMJ — arm contribution modest
SLJ · Single-Leg Jump
9.9 cm
22.9 W/kg
~57% of CMJ height — bilateral/unilateral gap
Read: The SSC contribution (CMJ − SJ = 1.5 cm) is modest — there's still room to develop the stretch-shortening cycle further. Arm-swing contribution is also small, suggesting upper-body coordination during jumps is an under-utilized resource.
6 · Programming Priorities
Priority
Block
Sample Modalities
Re-Test KPI
1
Unilateral strength & landing mechanics
RFE split squat 2× wk; single-leg RDL; step-down landings (3-sec eccentric); drop-and-stick from 20 cm box biased to weaker side
SLJ jump height ≥ 12 cm both sides
2
Maintain bilateral ceiling (working — keep it)
Keep current CMJ/CMRJ plyometric work; it has produced 33% gain
Hold CMJ ≥ 17 cm; RSI-Mod ≥ 0.30
3
SSC development
Depth jumps from 15–20 cm box (low height to start); altitude landings; pogo jumps with intent
CMJ − SJ gap ≥ 3 cm (currently 1.5)
4
Arm-swing coordination
Add arm-swing cueing to bilateral jumps; medicine ball overhead throws
ABCMJ − CMJ gap ≥ 2 cm (currently 0.2)
5
Get takeoff asymmetry below 10%
Symmetry-cued bilateral lifts (mirror work, force-plate visual feedback if available)
Peak takeoff asym < 10%
7 · Retest Schedule
Window
Battery
Decision Threshold
8 weeks (≈ 14 Jul 2026)
CMJ + SLJ + SLHAR — focused asymmetry check
SLJ asym < 15%; SLJ height ≥ 12 cm
16 weeks (≈ 9 Sep 2026)
Full battery — repeat 16 May tests
SLJ ≥ 12 cm each side; takeoff asym < 12%; CMJ ≥ 18 cm
Pre-season (Aug/Sep 2026)
Full battery + capacity work
Status report for coaching staff
8 · Reference Notes
All values pulled directly from the VALD ForceDecks API on 22 May 2026. Best-trial values shown unless noted. Asymmetry values reported as magnitude (worst-case across trials). RSI-Modified scaled to 0–1 range. Reference ranges drawn from age- and sex-matched normative data plus Catalyst's athlete pool. Sessions where a metric was not captured are excluded from that metric's chart.
Prepared by
Catalyst Performance · San Diego, CA
catalystperformancesd.com
For the attention of
Coaching & S&C staff
Maya Karcher — youth athlete development