Why this exists. Pilots without documented success criteria become arguments about whether they worked. Pilots with a signed Charter become a clean expand/hold/terminate decision backed by data both sides agreed to up front.
Why it's lightweight. These pilots are small — limited claim volume, subset of adjusters, fast turnaround. We don't ask carriers for IT integration or heavy data feeds. We use the rich operational data we already capture (FastEstimate logs, Seeker field telemetry, adjuster usage signals) and ask the carrier for three outcome data points per closed claim. Done.
For small pilots, Seek Now's instrumentation is more reliable than carrier IT integration. We already capture 54M+ structured data points per year, FastEstimate is fully instrumented, and Seeker field timing is ours to measure. The carrier's job is to confirm three outcomes — that's it.
Optional if relationship supports it:
Derived Derived metrics (we do the math): Supplemental rate vs baseline · FNOL → payment cycle time · Estimated $ saved (via ROI calculator framework).
| Metric | Source | What it tells us |
|---|---|---|
| FastEstimate adoption (% of pilot inspections using FE) | SN | Did the team actually use the tool? Foundation of every other metric. |
| Adjuster engagement (% of eligible adjusters using FE weekly) | SN | Breadth of adoption. Surfaces who needs targeted training. |
| Inspection → FE draft delivery time (minutes) | SN | Speed of our cycle contribution. Validates the sub-60-second story. |
| Adjuster review time in FE UI (per draft) | SN | Validates the time-savings claim — proves it's faster than cold-starting Xactimate. |
| Supplemental rate (% of claims with ≥1 supp) | Carrier | Accuracy proxy. Drop = first estimate was right. The strongest downstream signal. |
| FNOL → payment cycle time (days, end-to-end) | Derived | Combined operational metric. Maps to state DOI prompt-pay risk. |
Triggered by usage milestones (n8n workflow). Personalized with the customer's own data pulled from Seek Now operational systems. Sent from the AD's email, not no-reply.
Adoption snapshot, cycle time vs. industry benchmark, top adjuster usage, qualitative win. CTA: 15-min check-in.
Cumulative $ saved (ROI framework), supplemental reduction observed, FTE capacity unlocked. CTA: review with claims VP.
Full QBR readout. ROI realized, expansion opportunities, product roadmap preview. CTA: scope expansion or QBR cadence.
P1 deliverable (next 2 weeks): build the n8n automation + templates pulling from operational data automatically.
| Artifact | What it adds |
|---|---|
| Pilot Tracking System (Supabase + AD-facing form) | Single place to enter monthly carrier CSV. Auto-feeds the readout templates so they regenerate themselves with live numbers. |
| Auto-generated readout HTML | Carrier-specific URL like files.alexgolding.org/pilots/<carrier>/30day/ — pulls live from Supabase. |
| Post-Sale 30/60/90 Email Sequence | n8n workflow + three templated emails. Triggered by usage milestones, sent from AD's account. |